Tag: Matthew Stafford

  • Matthew Stafford Out, Aaron Rodgers In? Mike Tannenbaum Explains the Logic

    Matthew Stafford Out, Aaron Rodgers In? Mike Tannenbaum Explains the Logic

    The Los Angeles Rams are at a crossroads as they weigh their options at quarterback. With Matthew Stafford given permission to seek a trade, speculation has grown about who might step into the void if he departs. One name that has emerged as a potential short-term solution is none other than future Hall of Fame quarterback Aaron Rodgers.

    Former NFL GM and current analyst Mike Tannenbaum recently suggested Rodgers could be the perfect “band-aid” for the Rams, allowing them to remain competitive while grooming a long-term successor. But does this make sense for both Rodgers and the Rams? Let’s break it down.

    Why the Rams Might Be Looking to Make a Change?

    Stafford doesn’t have to leave LA but the Rams are allowing him to explore trades. Stafford led the Rams to a Super Bowl in 2021 and is entering the sunset of his career and may want a fresh start somewhere else. But as NFL insider Adam Schefter pointed out, it’s up to Stafford.

    “I think he should be happy with them. They should be happy with him,” Schefter said. “There are issues that both sides have been working through.”

    If he leaves the Rams will need a new QB quickly—especially with their win now mentality under Sean McVay.

    Why Aaron Rodgers makes sense for the Rams

    Rodgers’ resume is impressive. Four time NFL MVP, Super Bowl champion, one of the greatest QBs of all time. Even in New York he had 3,800 passing yards, 28 touchdowns, 11 interceptions last season. His efficiency numbers (passer rating, QBR) were off his peak but his experience and leadership would stabilize a Rams offense trying to stay competitive.

    A Short-Term Solution

    Mike Tannenbaum emphasized that Rodgers would serve as a bridge quarterback—a veteran presence to buy time while the Rams develop or draft their next franchise signal-caller.

    “Aaron Rodgers… not ideal, but what a great band-aid for the Rams in terms of a ‘we’re in a win-now mode,’” Tannenbaum said. “Buy some time to draft his replacement.”

    At 42 years old, Rodgers wouldn’t represent a long-term fix, but his arrival could keep the Rams relevant during a transitional phase.

    Why Los Angeles is Good for Rodgers?

    After two bad seasons with the Jets, Rodgers wants to prove he can still play at an elite level. With the Rams, he’d have the resources and coaching to do so.

    “[Rodgers] wants to play at least one more year,” Schefter said. “He’s got a chip on his shoulder. He wants to come back and show people he still has it and can get it done.”

    Los Angeles also gives Rodgers a chance to work with one of the smartest offensive minds in football: Sean McVay. Together they could relight his fire and let him chase another ring.

    Challenges to Consider

    Age and Health Concerns

    Rodgers will be 42 in December and has a recent injury history. The Rams have to decide if investing in Rodgers fits into their long term plans or just delays the rebuild.

    Financial Implications

    Stafford has $27 million in non-guaranteed money left on his contract which makes negotiations complicated. If the Rams get Rodgers they have to manage their cap space to address other roster needs. As Tannenbaum said, they’ll have to get creative with structuring contracts with void years to alleviate the financial strain.

    FAQs About Rodgers and the Rams

    Why would the Rams trade for Aaron Rodgers?

    The Rams are in win-now mode and need a proven QB if Stafford leaves. Rodgers’ experience and track record makes him a short-term option.

    Can Aaron Rodgers still lead a team?

    Rodgers’ efficiency declined in NY, but his raw stats say he can still produce. Playing behind a strong O-line and with better weapons could get him back on track.

    What if Matthew Stafford stays with the Rams?

    If Stafford stays, the Rams won’t trade for Rodgers. They’ll instead maximize his remaining years and address other needs in FA and the draft.

    How much would it cost the Rams to get Rodgers?

    Trading for Rodgers would require draft capital, but less than a younger QB. They’d have to restructure his deal to fit under the cap.

    Would Aaron Rodgers want to go to the Rams?

    Yes, LA is a great destination for Rodgers. Play for a contender, work with McVay and rebuild his legacy after a rough year in NY.

  • Do Trades for Star Veteran QBs Deliver Results? The Truth

    Do Trades for Star Veteran QBs Deliver Results? The Truth

    The New York Giants are shopping for Matthew Stafford and the debate is on whether trading for an elite veteran QB is smart. History shows mixed results, some ended in championships and others in disaster. Let’s break it down.

    The Giants’ QB History: A Different Way

    The Giants rarely draft QBs early, instead they trade and sign in free agency to find their starters.

    • Draft History: Since 1960 the Giants have only drafted 5 QBs in the first 3 rounds: Phil Simms, Philip Rivers (traded for Eli Manning), Daniel Jones, Jeff Hostetler, and Davis Webb.
    • Trade History: The Giants have a long history of trading for veteran QBs: Y.A. Tittle, Fran Tarkenton, Craig Morton.
    • Current Rumors: Now with Matthew Stafford available they are considering going back to their old way.

    Recent Examples of Elite QB Trades: Hits and Misses

    Aaron Rodgers (Packers → Jets)

    • Cost: 2 2nd round picks, 6th round pick, 1st round pick swap (13 → 15)
    • Age When Traded: 39

    Aaron Rodgers’ move to the Jets was supposed to be a slam dunk but ended up a complete disaster. In his first series as a Jet, Rodgers tore his Achilles and missed most of the season. Even when he returned, he wasn’t the same guy. Off-field drama added to the issue and the team fired coach Robert Saleh and GM Joe Douglas.

    Key Takeaway: Trading for a QB in their late 30s is a risk, especially if the supporting cast isn’t good enough to elevate them.

    Russell Wilson (Seahawks → Broncos)

    • Cost: 2 1st round picks, 2 2nd round picks, 5th round pick, Noah Fant, Shelby Harris, Drew Lock
    • Age When Traded: 33

    Wilson had a falling out with the Seahawks over the offense and was shipped to Denver with high hopes. Unfortunately under two different coaches he never recaptured his early career magic. After two bad seasons he was released and signed with Pittsburgh for cheap.

    Key Takeaway: A QB’s decline can start earlier than you think and a bad fit in the system can accelerate that decline.

    Matt Ryan (Falcons → Colts)

    • Cost: 3rd
    • Age When Traded: 37

    Colts took a low risk on Matt Ryan and gave up only a 3rd. Ryan played like a shell of himself and threw almost as many INTs as TDs and was clearly past his prime. He retired at the end of the season.

    Key Takeaway: Low cost trades for aging QBs can backfire if the player is already done.

    Deshaun Watson (Texans → Browns)

    • Cost: 3 1st, 3rd, 2 4th, 6th
    • Age When Traded: 26

    This is the worst trade in NFL history. The Browns have given up a king’s ransom and Watson has yet to produce.

    Key Takeaway: Overpaying for a quarterback, even a young one, can sink a franchise for years if the player doesn’t deliver.

    Matthew Stafford/Jared Goff (Lions → Rams)

    • Cost: Jared Goff, two 1st round picks, and a 3rd round pick
    • Age When Traded: 33

    This trade worked out okay for both teams. The Rams won a Super Bowl with Stafford and the Lions used the draft picks to build a great roster and revive Jared Goff’s career.

    Key Takeaway: Swapping quarterbacks can work out for both teams, especially if one team is rebuilding and the other is in win-now mode.

    Brett Favre (Packers → Jets)

    • Cost: Conditional 4th round pick
    • Age When Traded: 38

    Favre’s trade to the Jets was unique because he retired first and then changed his mind. His one season with the Jets was meh, injury and decline marred.

    Key Takeaway: Even legendary quarterbacks can struggle to adjust to new systems late in their careers.

    Warren Moon (Oilers → Vikings)

    • Cost: 4th and conditional 3rd round picks
    • Age When Traded: 38

    Moon proved older quarterbacks can still do well in the right situation. He had two great seasons with the Vikings before injuries caught up with him.

    Key Takeaway: Age isn’t always a problem if the quarterback lands in a good situation.

    Joe Montana (49ers → Chiefs)

    • Cost: First-round pick; Kansas City also got Steve Whitmore and a third-round pick
    • Age When Traded: 37

    Montana wasn’t the same player in Kansas City as he was in San Francisco but he still made the AFC Championship Game in his first season.

    Key Takeaway: Trading for a Hall of Fame quarterback nearing retirement can work short term.

    What Should the Giants Do?

    The Giants are in a tough spot. After years of searching for stability at quarterback they may go after Matthew Stafford if he becomes available. But should they?

    Pros of Trading for Stafford

    • Resume: Stafford won a Super Bowl with the Rams and can still lead a winner.
    • Mentorship: Pairing Stafford with a 2024 rookie quarterback could be a smooth transition plan.
    • Cap management: With creative contract structuring the Giants can manage Stafford’s $50M+ salary without crippling their cap space.

    Cons of Trading for Stafford

    • Age: 36 and entering the twilight of his career. Durability has been a question mark lately.
    • Draft capital risk: Giving up first round picks could set the franchise back if Stafford doesn’t produce immediately.
    • Roster holes: The Giants still need edge defender, defensive tackle and cornerback. Trading away draft picks for Stafford could leave those holes unfilled.

    FAQs About Trading for Elite Veteran Quarterbacks

    Do trades for elite veteran quarterbacks work out?

    Rarely. Most trades end in disappointment due to age, poor fit or overpay. But there’s an exception like Matthew Stafford and the Rams.

    What determines if a QB trade works?

    Age, health, supporting cast and cost of the QB. Teams have to weigh short term gain vs long term sustainability.

    Is Matthew Stafford worth it for the Giants?

    He’s worth it if the Giants don’t have to give up significant draft capital and they address other roster needs. But his age and injury history are red flags.

    Why do teams keep trading for aging QBs despite the risks?

    Teams feel pressure to win now especially if they’re close to contention. An elite veteran QB is the best way to win now even if it costs.

    What’s the biggest lesson from past QB trades?

    Overpaying for a QB especially one in decline can destroy a franchise for years. Teams must evaluate the player’s remaining upside and overall fit with their roster.

  • Will the Giants Land Matthew Stafford? Team Vows to Explore All Options

    Will the Giants Land Matthew Stafford? Team Vows to Explore All Options

    The New York Giants are at a crossroads. After a 3-14 season they know they need to find a franchise quarterback. With the 3rd pick in the 2025 NFL Draft and a weak quarterback class the Giants are exploring all options – including a blockbuster trade for Rams’ veteran Matthew Stafford.

    The Giants’ Quarterback Dilemma

    The Giants need a quarterback. Tommy DeVito is the only QB under contract and they can’t wait for the draft to address the position.

    • Draft Issues: The 2025 quarterback class is thin and top prospects Cam Ward of Miami and Shedeur Sanders of Colorado may be out of reach at 3.
    • Trade Options: The Giants are said to be looking to trade for 37 year old Matthew Stafford who showed in 2024 he still has some juice left.
    • Free Agency: The free agent pool is weak so trades and the draft are the only options.

    Joe Schoen’s Plan: ‘Take Swings’ at QB

    Giants GM Joe Schoen said at the NFL Scouting Combine the team will try everything to find its next QB.

    “I’m for taking swings at that position,’’ Schoen said. “It’s the most important position, and it’s hard to find ‘em, so keep swinging. Keep swinging at the position until you find one.’’

    Schoen said they’ll consider all options: draft, free agency, trade. The bottom line: find a QB that gives them the best chance to win.

    Matthew Stafford: The Answer?

    Matthew Stafford is being targeted by the Giants. The 37 year old quarterback had a great 2024 season and is the stability the Giants need.

    • Why Stafford?: He’s a proven winner with a Super Bowl ring and experience leading a young team.
    • Trade Cost: Acquiring Stafford would cost draft capital but the Giants may see it as worth it.
    • Short Term Fix: While Stafford isn’t a long term solution he can bridge the gap while the Giants continue to find their franchise QB.

    Draft Options: Cam Ward and Shedeur Sanders

    If the Giants are going to stick with the draft their options are limited.

    • Cam Ward: The Miami quarterback is a top prospect but may not be available at 3. The Giants would have to trade up to get him.
    • Shedeur Sanders: The Colorado star and son of Deion Sanders is another option but his draft stock is uncertain.

    Schoen said they can’t take a quarterback just to “check the box”. They need to find the right fit even if that means looking outside the draft.

    FAQs About the Giants’ Quarterback Search

    Why can’t the Giants rely on Tommy DeVito?

    He showed some flashes but hasn’t been consistent or has the upside to be a franchise QB. The Giants view him as a backup going forward.

    Is Matthew Stafford worth the investment at 37?

    Yes if the price is right. His track record is proven — Super Bowl champ, clutch performer, can elevate an offense. For a team in win now mode he’s a stopgap solution.

    Can the Giants draft a QB outside the top 3?

    They could but highly unlikely they’d find a franchise QB later in the draft. A Day 2 or Day 3 prospect takes time to develop and the Giants may not have the luxury of waiting for that.

    What if the Giants miss out on Stafford?

    If Stafford isn’t an option the Giants will pivot to drafting a QB early or signing a bridge QB in free agency. Either way failing to address the position would be a disaster for the organization.